<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.4.1">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/feed/content/tibetan-roots.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-06-11T19:50:13+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/feed/content/tibetan-roots.xml</id><title type="html">The Open Buddhist University | Content | History of Tibetan Buddhism</title><subtitle>A website dedicated to providing free, online courses and bibliographies in Buddhist Studies. </subtitle><author><name>Khemarato Bhikkhu</name><uri>https://twitter.com/buddhistuni</uri></author><entry><title type="html">Exorcising the Body Politic: The Lion’s Roar, Köten Ejen’s Two Bodies and the Question of Conversion at the Tibet-Mongol Interface</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/exorcising-body-politic_king-m" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Exorcising the Body Politic: The Lion’s Roar, Köten Ejen’s Two Bodies and the Question of Conversion at the Tibet-Mongol Interface" /><published>2025-09-10T10:55:58+07:00</published><updated>2025-09-15T06:54:42+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/exorcising-body-politic_king-m</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/exorcising-body-politic_king-m"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>In 1240, Köten famously summoned the Central Tibetan Buddhist polymath Sakya Pandita, by then already an old man, to his court at Liangzhou.
Examining Tibetan and Mongolian accounts about their meeting from the last seven centuries, this study shows that it was neither compelling philosophy nor some turn of faith that converted the Mongols.
It was, rather, Sakya Pandita’s violent therapeutic intervention into the space of Köten’s ill body that wrenched the Mongol body politic into the Dharmic fold.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Matthew King</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="mongolian" /><category term="medieval" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[In 1240, Köten famously summoned the Central Tibetan Buddhist polymath Sakya Pandita, by then already an old man, to his court at Liangzhou. Examining Tibetan and Mongolian accounts about their meeting from the last seven centuries, this study shows that it was neither compelling philosophy nor some turn of faith that converted the Mongols. It was, rather, Sakya Pandita’s violent therapeutic intervention into the space of Köten’s ill body that wrenched the Mongol body politic into the Dharmic fold.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">The Divinity of the Dalai Lama and its Scriptural Sources: A Study in Tibetan Political Theology</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/divinity-of-the-dalai-lama-scriptural-sources_maccormack-ian" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The Divinity of the Dalai Lama and its Scriptural Sources: A Study in Tibetan Political Theology" /><published>2025-06-15T19:39:56+07:00</published><updated>2025-06-15T19:39:56+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/divinity-of-the-dalai-lama-scriptural-sources_maccormack-ian</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/divinity-of-the-dalai-lama-scriptural-sources_maccormack-ian"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>The fifth Dalai Lama was figured as the state’s absolute ruler on the basis of a power in excess of his own person. In technical terms, he was the latest in a rebirth line of Avalokiteśvara, here assuming the novel identity of a “renunciate king” or vow-bound sovereign.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In the first part of his two-part study, Ian MacCormack examines the theological foundations of the Dalai Lama’s divine kingship as articulated by the Desi Sangyé Gyatso (1653–1705), the 5th Dalai Lama’s regent. This nuanced depiction underscores the complex interplay between ultimate truth and conventional reality in Tibetan political theology.</p>

<p>Part two of this study can be found <a href="/content/articles/mortality-of-the-dalai-lama_maccormack-ian">here</a></p>]]></content><author><name>Ian MacCormack</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibet" /><category term="political-ideology" /><category term="society" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[The fifth Dalai Lama was figured as the state’s absolute ruler on the basis of a power in excess of his own person. In technical terms, he was the latest in a rebirth line of Avalokiteśvara, here assuming the novel identity of a “renunciate king” or vow-bound sovereign.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Sacred Heights in the Topography of Flatlands: Ovaa Kurgans in the Kalmyk Buddhist Landscape</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sacred-heights-in-topography-of_gazizova-valeria" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Sacred Heights in the Topography of Flatlands: Ovaa Kurgans in the Kalmyk Buddhist Landscape" /><published>2024-11-26T13:40:00+07:00</published><updated>2025-03-05T14:27:36+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sacred-heights-in-topography-of_gazizova-valeria</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sacred-heights-in-topography-of_gazizova-valeria"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Continuously enfolding the lives,
activities, values and times of all its previous inhabitants, the landscape is
simultaneously unfolding to its current inhabitant or observer as a
corpus of heterogeneous narratives – myths, legends, historical accounts or individual
life-histories attached to it. […]
‘Landscape is time materializing.’</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Valeria Gazizova</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="inner-asia" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="kalmykia" /><category term="past" /><category term="places" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Continuously enfolding the lives, activities, values and times of all its previous inhabitants, the landscape is simultaneously unfolding to its current inhabitant or observer as a corpus of heterogeneous narratives – myths, legends, historical accounts or individual life-histories attached to it. […] ‘Landscape is time materializing.’]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Rewritten or Reused?: Originality, Intertextuality, and Reuse in the Writings of a Buddhist Visionary in Contemporary Tibet</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/rewritten-or-reused-originality_terrone-antonio" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Rewritten or Reused?: Originality, Intertextuality, and Reuse in the Writings of a Buddhist Visionary in Contemporary Tibet" /><published>2024-02-17T19:55:24+07:00</published><updated>2024-09-24T14:48:08+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/rewritten-or-reused-originality_terrone-antonio</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/rewritten-or-reused-originality_terrone-antonio"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>This study examines the phenomenon of borrowing and reusing portions of texts without attributing them to their ‘legitimate authors’ within the Buddhist world of contemporary Tibet.
It shows that not only is such a practice not at all infrequent and is often socially accepted, but that it is used in this case as a platform to advance specific claims and promote an explicit agenda.
Therefore, rather than considering these as instances of plagiarism, this essay looks at the practice of copying and borrowing as an exercise in intertextuality, intended as the faithful retransmission of ancient truths, and as an indication of the public domain of texts in Tibet.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Antonio Terrone</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="ip-law" /><category term="writing" /><category term="dialogue" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[This study examines the phenomenon of borrowing and reusing portions of texts without attributing them to their ‘legitimate authors’ within the Buddhist world of contemporary Tibet. It shows that not only is such a practice not at all infrequent and is often socially accepted, but that it is used in this case as a platform to advance specific claims and promote an explicit agenda. Therefore, rather than considering these as instances of plagiarism, this essay looks at the practice of copying and borrowing as an exercise in intertextuality, intended as the faithful retransmission of ancient truths, and as an indication of the public domain of texts in Tibet.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Buddhist Theories of Existents: The System of Two Truths</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/papers/two-truths_jones-elvin" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Buddhist Theories of Existents: The System of Two Truths" /><published>2023-10-23T14:25:32+07:00</published><updated>2024-09-24T14:48:08+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/papers/two-truths_jones-elvin</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/papers/two-truths_jones-elvin"><![CDATA[<p>An excellent overview of the history of Indian Buddhist metaphysics from the perspective of the Tibetan (<em>Mādhyamika</em>) <em>siddhānta</em> literature.</p>]]></content><author><name>Elvin W. Jones</name></author><category term="papers" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="mahayana" /><category term="emptiness" /><category term="epistemology" /><category term="metaphysics" /><category term="dialogue" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[An excellent overview of the history of Indian Buddhist metaphysics from the perspective of the Tibetan (Mādhyamika) siddhānta literature.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/concepts-intension-and-identity-in_stoltz-jonathan" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language" /><published>2023-05-26T15:20:04+07:00</published><updated>2024-09-24T14:48:08+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/concepts-intension-and-identity-in_stoltz-jonathan</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/concepts-intension-and-identity-in_stoltz-jonathan"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>thinkers developed the notion of a ‘concept’ in order to explain how it is that words are capable of applying
to real objects, and how concepts can be used to capture elements of
word meaning extending beyond reference to real objects. In particular, I will focus on the developments made by Phywa pa Chos kyi
seṅ ge in the middle of the twelfth century, as well as on reactions to 
those developments by Sa skya Paṇḍita</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Jonathan Stoltz</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="intellect" /><category term="language" /><category term="epistemology" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[thinkers developed the notion of a ‘concept’ in order to explain how it is that words are capable of applying to real objects, and how concepts can be used to capture elements of word meaning extending beyond reference to real objects. In particular, I will focus on the developments made by Phywa pa Chos kyi seṅ ge in the middle of the twelfth century, as well as on reactions to those developments by Sa skya Paṇḍita]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">In the Forest of the Blind: The Eurasian Journey of Faxian’s Record of Buddhist Kingdoms</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/forest-of-the-blind_king-matthew" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="In the Forest of the Blind: The Eurasian Journey of Faxian’s Record of Buddhist Kingdoms" /><published>2022-10-23T14:17:51+07:00</published><updated>2023-11-03T12:10:21+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/forest-of-the-blind_king-matthew</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/forest-of-the-blind_king-matthew"><![CDATA[<p>How Abel-Rémusat’s “poaching” of Asian scholarship facilitated the creation of Western “Buddhist Studies” as a discipline and how his <em>Relation des Royaumes Bouddhiques</em> was in turn coopted by Himalayan Buddhists fighting in the collapse of the Qing says a lot about the production of academic knowledge.</p>]]></content><author><name>Matthew W. King</name></author><category term="av" /><category term="dialogue" /><category term="historiography" /><category term="academic" /><category term="academia" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="roots" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[How Abel-Rémusat’s “poaching” of Asian scholarship facilitated the creation of Western “Buddhist Studies” as a discipline and how his Relation des Royaumes Bouddhiques was in turn coopted by Himalayan Buddhists fighting in the collapse of the Qing says a lot about the production of academic knowledge.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Gender in Buddhist Theory and Practice</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/gender-in-buddhism_liang-jue" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Gender in Buddhist Theory and Practice" /><published>2022-06-16T11:49:30+07:00</published><updated>2024-09-24T14:48:08+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/gender-in-buddhism_liang-jue</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/gender-in-buddhism_liang-jue"><![CDATA[<p>A scholarly conversation about the first women in Tibetan Buddhism.</p>]]></content><author><name>Jue Liang</name></author><category term="av" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="nuns" /><category term="form" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[A scholarly conversation about the first women in Tibetan Buddhism.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Atha niryāṇavṛttam: Reflections on the First Sūtra and the Opening Passages of Guṇaprabha’s Vinayasūtra and Autocommentary</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/atha-niryanavrttam_nietupski-paul" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Atha niryāṇavṛttam: Reflections on the First Sūtra and the Opening Passages of Guṇaprabha’s Vinayasūtra and Autocommentary" /><published>2022-05-10T11:52:08+07:00</published><updated>2024-11-12T10:51:57+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/atha-niryanavrttam_nietupski-paul</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/atha-niryanavrttam_nietupski-paul"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>… observance of the monastic rules was not intended to be only a matter of acceptance of institutional rules and lifestyles. […] educated monks understood a causal connection between the exercise of ethical behavior in a monastic lifestyle and progress on the path</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Mahayana (and Tantric) Buddhism is often portrayed as antinomian or even “lay oriented” but, while certainly a strand, did not constitute the mainstream understanding, even in late India.</p>]]></content><author><name>Paul K. Nietupski</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="mahayana-vinaya" /><category term="mahayana-roots" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="ethics" /><category term="monastic-advice" /><category term="tantric" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[… observance of the monastic rules was not intended to be only a matter of acceptance of institutional rules and lifestyles. […] educated monks understood a causal connection between the exercise of ethical behavior in a monastic lifestyle and progress on the path]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">The Electronic Atlas of Buddhist Monasteries of Asia between approx. 200 and 1200 CE.</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/reference/electronic-atlas-of-monasteries_ciolek" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The Electronic Atlas of Buddhist Monasteries of Asia between approx. 200 and 1200 CE." /><published>2022-05-03T20:10:28+07:00</published><updated>2023-05-17T18:47:13+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/reference/electronic-atlas-of-monasteries_ciolek</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/reference/electronic-atlas-of-monasteries_ciolek"><![CDATA[<p>A fairly comprehensive atlas of known archeological sites containing evidence of medieval Buddhists showing the spread of Buddhism across Asia.</p>]]></content><author><name>Stewart Gordon</name></author><category term="reference" /><category term="medieval" /><category term="mahayana-roots" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="tantric-roots" /><category term="theravada-roots" /><category term="east-asian-roots" /><category term="sects" /><category term="form" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[A fairly comprehensive atlas of known archeological sites containing evidence of medieval Buddhists showing the spread of Buddhism across Asia.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">The Shuk-den Affair: History and Nature of a Quarrel</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/shukden-affair_dreyfus-george" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The Shuk-den Affair: History and Nature of a Quarrel" /><published>2021-09-03T10:19:32+07:00</published><updated>2024-11-02T22:50:39+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/shukden-affair_dreyfus-george</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/shukden-affair_dreyfus-george"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>In  recent  years  the  community  of  Tibetan  Buddhists  has  been  agitated  by  an  intense  dispute  concerning  the  practice  of  a  controversial  deity,  Gyel-chen  Dor-je  Shuk-den. Several  Tibetan  monks  have  been  brutally  murdered,  and  the  Tibetan  community  in  general  and  the  Geluk  tradition  in  particular  have  become  profoundly  polarized. […] Why  is  Shugden  so controversial?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>An excellent explainer of the Dalai Lama’s antipathy towards this peculiar Gelug protector.</p>]]></content><author><name>George Dreyfus</name></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibet" /><category term="gelug" /><category term="shugden" /><category term="ideology" /><category term="groups" /><category term="power" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[In recent years the community of Tibetan Buddhists has been agitated by an intense dispute concerning the practice of a controversial deity, Gyel-chen Dor-je Shuk-den. Several Tibetan monks have been brutally murdered, and the Tibetan community in general and the Geluk tradition in particular have become profoundly polarized. […] Why is Shugden so controversial?]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Sa skya pandita’s Account of the bSam yas Debate: History as Polemic</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sa-skya-on-bsam-yas_jackson-roger" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Sa skya pandita’s Account of the bSam yas Debate: History as Polemic" /><published>2021-06-22T09:59:34+07:00</published><updated>2024-11-02T22:50:39+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sa-skya-on-bsam-yas_jackson-roger</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/sa-skya-on-bsam-yas_jackson-roger"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>… does the garuda alight from the sky on the treetop with his wings grown instantaneously to maturity, or once he has been born in a crag or elsewhere, must his wings mature gradually?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>An early account of the legendary debate that forever oriented Tibetan Buddhism South towards India—and away from China.</p>

<p><strong>Important Note!</strong> Please also read pages 17–22 of <a href="https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jiabs/article/download/8772/2679/0" target="_blank" ga-event-value="0.5">David Jackson’s summary of the controversy this article stirred up</a>, published eight years later in the same journal. Did you notice the original paper’s key methodological flaw?</p>]]></content><author><name>Roger Jackson</name><uri>https://buddhistuniversity.net/authors/jackson-roger</uri></author><category term="articles" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="mahamudra" /><category term="historiography" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[… does the garuda alight from the sky on the treetop with his wings grown instantaneously to maturity, or once he has been born in a crag or elsewhere, must his wings mature gradually?]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">The Sun that Causes the Lotus of Intelligence to Bloom: In Praise of the Lineage of Gurus for the Noble Abhidharma</title><link href="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/essays/abhidharma-praise_rongton" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The Sun that Causes the Lotus of Intelligence to Bloom: In Praise of the Lineage of Gurus for the Noble Abhidharma" /><published>2021-04-21T15:47:16+07:00</published><updated>2025-05-18T19:11:15+07:00</updated><id>https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/essays/abhidharma-praise_rongton</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/essays/abhidharma-praise_rongton"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Although you do not move…</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Rongtön Sheja Kunrig</name><uri>https://buddhistuniversity.net/authors/rongton</uri></author><category term="essays" /><category term="tibetan-roots" /><category term="abhidhamma" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Although you do not move…]]></summary></entry></feed>