The Intellect
Subscribe to this topic via: RSS
Saṅkhāra: How humans think and decide.
Caution! Under Construction
Please be aware that this tag is still under construction and as such is missing information and may be changed or removed at any time. Please pardon our dust as you peruse this incomplete bibliography.
Table of Contents
Books (10)
Featured:
-
⭐ Recommended
-
365 pages[recommended but under copyright]
See also:
Canonical Works (9)
Readings (19)
Featured:
-
⭐ Recommended
Nagarjuna seems willing to embrace contradictions while at the same time making use of classic reductio arguments. He asserts that he rejects all philosophical views including his own-that he asserts nothing-and appears to mean it. It is argued here that he, like many philosophers in the West and, indeed, like many of his Buddhist colleagues, discovers and explores true contradictions arising at the limits of thought. For those who share a dialetheist’s comfort with the possibility of true contradictions commanding rational assent, for Nagarjuna to endorse such contradictions would not undermine but instead confirm the impression that he is indeed a highly rational thinker. It is argued that the contradictions he discovers are structurally analogous to many discovered by Western philosophers and mathematicians.
-
… language, concepts, and meanings are embodied through our dispositions, abilities, comportment, and actions
-
⭐ Recommended
Beliefs can be highly resilient in the sense that they are not easily abandoned in the face of counterevidence. This has the advantage of guiding consistent behavior and judgments but may also have destructive consequences for individuals, nature, and society. For instance, pathological beliefs can sustain psychiatric disorders, the belief that rhinoceros horn is an aphrodisiac may drive a species extinct, beliefs about gender or race may fuel discrimination, and belief in conspiracy theories can undermine democracy. Here, we present a unifying framework of how self-amplifying feedbacks shape the inertia of beliefs on levels ranging from neuronal networks to social systems.
-
For me, understanding is more and more taking the form of understanding the necessity of the tensions and problems and the simple importance of my grappling with them. I do not seek their dissolution, for that would negate the human experience; rather, I seek to understand them, my relations to them, and how best to navigate them.
-
This paper revisits a landmark study of the prevalence of mental illness in the state of Massachusetts conducted by Edward Jarvis in the 19th century. Jarvis drew an improper conclusion about the relationship between social class, ethnicity, and insanity, asserting that the Irish foreign-born had a higher prevalence of insanity in each social stratum. A reanalysis of Jarvis’ data shows that in both the pauper and independent social classes in Massachusetts, the prevalence of insanity was significantly lower among foreign-born persons than among native-born persons.
-
Childhood lead exposure has devastating lifelong consequences, as even low-level exposure stunts intelligence and leads to delinquent behavior. However, these consequences may be more extensive than previously thought because childhood lead exposure may adversely affect normal-range personality traits.
-
The precise ways in which human cognition differs from that of other species remains a topic of intense debate, but many data currently support the hypothesis that it is an early emerging set of social skills for reasoning about conspecifics as intentional agents, coupled with a distinctly cooperative and prosocial motivation, that fuels many of our most remarkable cognitive achievements.
See also:
Audio/Video (40)
Featured:
-
… your conscious mind is more a press secretary. You’re not the president or the king or the CEO. You aren’t in charge. You aren’t actually making the decision, the conscious part of your mind at least. You are there to make up a good explanation for what’s going on so that you can avoid the accusation that you are violating norms.
-
⭐ Recommended
41 min -
How Freudian psychology can explain the appeal of Donald Trump’s rambling rhetoric and much else in (especially American) politics.
-
⭐ Recommended
There isn’t “knowledge” as we’re used to thinking about it: figuring out, given observations and experiences in the world, what is “true” and once you come to “knowledge” you get to keep it for life. I now appreciate that everything is beliefs, is just a best guess.
1h 32m -
-
⭐ Recommended
They were very disoriented, obviously, after flipping. They got out of their seat belts and out of the car and, because I had skidded, my head was bleeding profusely…
-
… one of the most interesting things Open Philanthropy does is the way you intentionally divide up your giving portfolio into buckets based on really different ethical, arguably even metaphysical, assumptions. So tell me about “worldview diversification.”
1h 30m -
Acknowledging it doesn’t change your vulnerability. You’re vulnerable whether you develop a language to think about it or not.
1h 23m -
The greatest power of games is that you can explore this landscape of different agencies. The greatest danger of games is that you can get sucked into this experience of wanting to be in a clear, crisp and gentle universe where you know exactly what to do and exactly how it’s measured.
1h 13m -
You never begin by saying, “I’m going to be a tyrannist dictator, and I’m going to ruin your life.” You don’t start out that way. You start out by saying, “I’m going to make things so much better. And you want that, don’t you, Ezra?”
68 min -
The author of Why Smart People Make Stupid Mistakes discusses the dangers of intelligence and how to avoid them through intellectual humility.
63 min -
36 min -
11 min -
⭐ Recommended
I raise a finger to a point in the night…
5 min -
⭐ Recommended
Human horrors
are not inevitable. Some people stop
themselves, before they cross moral divides.5 min -
⭐ Recommended
Everything’s been said
But one last thing about the desert,
And it’s awful: …5 min -
what counts here does anything count
on the short walk while looking down and then over then up…6 min -
You were between two animals.
Between two attributions.
At the crotch of a river’s fork.
At a loss, at least…5 min -
Whatever I learn makes me angry to have learned it.
5 min -
Over Canada / or two hours of frozen waves I assume is Canada /
I’m surrounded by babies / so many babies…5 min -
I share my house with a colony of bats.
They live in the roof peak,
enter through a gap.5 min -
Once I heard a scientist with
Alzheimer’s on the radio, trying to
figure out why he could no longer
draw a clock.5 min
See also:
